| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 2000-04-14
                 
                 
                UK: Datenschuetzer verurteilen Ueberwachungsgesetz
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      q/depesche 00.4.14/2 
 
 
UK: Datenschuetzer verurteilen Ueberwachungsgesetz  
 
Das bezeichnenderweise mit RIP akronymi/sierte Schnüffelgesetz  
"Regulation of Investigatory Powers" der Labour-Regierung ist von  
Ihrer Majestät offiziellem Datenschutzbeauftragten in Grund & Boden   
gestampft worden.  
 
 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-  
Data protection watchdog slams Snooping Bill The Home Office's  
Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill faced its most damning  
condemnation so far when the UK data protection watchdog  
presented its concerns to the Home Office. 
 
The Data Protection Commission (DPC) - formerly the Data  
Protection Registrar (DPR) - which handles the protection of personal  
data in the UK, voiced a number of reservations about the Bill in a  
response document submitted to the Home Office during the  
standing committee period which ended 6 April. The DPC report  
contains a wide range of objections raised by Elizabeth France,  
commissioner of the DPC. 
 
Francis Aldhouse, deputy commissioner of the DPC, said the  
organisation fears the legislation on encryption could leave individuals  
open to an invasion of privacy.  
 
"If a key is demanded by a law enforcement agency, you might be  
entirely innocent. It might be to do with somebody else's  
communications but you cannot be told that your security has been  
prejudiced and that is a problem from our point of view," he said. 
... 
He added: "Interception of communications is a breach of the right to  
privacy. It can be justified on special public policy grounds such as  
the right to investigate crime but there have to be some strict criteria  
which must be satisfied."  
... 
Simon Davies, director general of rights group Privacy International  
UK, welcomed the DPR's position but said it hasn't taken its  
criticism far enough. "I'm disappointed. It would be useful for the  
commissioner - who has a privacy mandate - to have taken a  
stronger view. They've missed a rare opportunity to stop the Bill in its  
tracks," said Davies. 
.... 
In a written response, the Home Office said the RIP Bill is  
"complementary" to the Human Rights Bill. "We are committed to  
making the UK the best and safest place in the world for ecommerce  
to take place... the government fully recognises the value of  
encryption not just to the individual and to the ecommerce revolution,  
but also as a crime prevention tool in itself, for example in preventing  
fraud on the Internet," it stated. 
 
Full Story 
http://www.silicon.com/bin/bladerunner?REQUNIQ=955718613&30REQEVENT=
                   
 
 
Related 
 'Snooping Bill' slammed by Silicon.com viewers'  
http://www.silicon.com/a36839
                   
'Government accused of 'hopelessly underestimating' RIP costs'  
http://www.silicon.com/a36658  
 
-.-  -.-. --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by Harkank 
published on: 2000-04-14 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |